Courtyard.io Prints About $611K in 24-Hour NFT Volume as Floor Holds Near $5.52
By Crypto Wire
November 2, 2026
Courtyard.io is still the loudest phygital tape on CoinGecko’s NFT board this Pacific morning. The Polygon-side Courtyard collection print shows about $610,667 in twenty-four-hour volume (~268.26 ETH), roughly 13,449 one-day sales, a floor near 0.00242 ETH (~$5.52), market cap near $2.54 million, and about 136,204 unique addresses against a total supply near 459,732.
That is a marketplace-depth print, not a new pack launch. Courtyard’s product remains vaulted physical cards tokenized on Polygon: keep them vaulted, trade the NFT, or burn for shipment. CoinGecko’s contract pointer for the tracked set is 0x251be3a17af4892035c37ebf5890f4a4d889dcad on Polygon PoS. A Korean market wrap earlier Monday also put Courtyard atop a CoinGecko volume board near $657K with a floor near $5.63 — useful color that the same desk was already leading volume boards before this morning’s refreshed $611K / $5.52 sticker.
The day-over-day tape is cooler than a breakout headline. CoinGecko shows twenty-four-hour volume down about 15% and one-day sales down about 5%, with average sale price near 0.020 ETH. Floor is only up about 1.2% in dollars on the same board. Phygital desks care because Courtyard can still clear five-figure sales and mid-six-figure dollars without needing a fresh Cup odds retune to stay visible on the global NFT volume board.
Context ties this print to last week’s Basketball Cup chapters without rehashing them. The Cup pack opener and PackAnalyst odds retune already live as separate LNs (11821, 11923). Today’s primary is the CoinGecko collection tape for Courtyard.io itself — volume, sales count, floor, and holder breadth — not another sealed-pack median or bounty receipt.
What this piece will not invent: a claim that every dollar of the $611K print came from Basketball Cup packs, a new Courtyard product calendar, or a burn-to-ship fulfillment backlog. CoinGecko’s board aggregates Courtyard.io trading; pack-level odds and bounty receipts stay on their own chapters. Prefer the CoinGecko Courtyard.io page and Courtyard’s own site before treating a third-party volume crown as permanent.
For bid sizing, the risks are ordinary phygital-market risks. A $5.52 floor on nearly 460K supply is a sticker, not a promise every vaulted card clears that ask. Volume down mid-teens day-over-day means the tape is still busy but not accelerating. Unique addresses above 136K show breadth; they do not prove every wallet is an active buyer today. Those are facts on the board, not a verdict that Courtyard fades — only that this chapter is a depth print, not a sellout counter.
Competitors on the same global NFT board still include blue-chip PFP sets with thinner sale counts and higher floors. Courtyard’s edge on this morning’s tape is throughput: five-figure sales and mid-six-figure dollars on vaulted physical rails while Robinhood Chain free mints soak the overnight mint calendar. Until CoinGecko’s next refresh flips the volume stack, the durable desk fact is Courtyard’s still-elevated 24-hour print beside a stable mid-single-digit floor. That combination — high sale count, mid-six-figure dollars, and a floor that barely budged — is why Phygital keeps Courtyard on the morning board even when the day-over-day volume cools.
Phygital watch: Track whether Courtyard’s CoinGecko 24-hour volume holds above ~$500K into the next Pacific session, whether the floor stays in the $5.00–$6.00 band, and whether Courtyard posts a dated pack or bounty primary that can explain the next volume spike without a third-party wrap.
Bottom line: CoinGecko puts Courtyard.io near $611K in 24-hour volume with about 13,449 sales and a floor near $5.52 — a phygital depth print separate from the Cup pack chapters.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or trading advice. The NFT market is highly volatile, and past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals before making any decisions related to digital assets. The cover image for this article may have been created using artificial intelligence (AI).
